All Things Techie With Huge, Unstructured, Intuitive Leaps
Showing posts with label valuation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label valuation. Show all posts

When Analytics & Big Data Fail ~ Why You Have Trouble Getting A Decent Price For Your Auto Trade-In


(click on pic for larger image)

Analytics and Big Data are not always the panacea to solve everyday problems in life. This is especially true in our business. We are remarketers of automobiles. We started from a large bricks & mortar auto auction on the East Coast, and we wanted to transfer our business to the canvas of the web, and bring incredible added value to a necessary, but un-glamorous industry with a technology platform that is 21rst century instead of the 18th century auction.  And the foundation patents that we have pending in the private buyers network prove that we have done our homework and done  technological wonders by introducing private buyers networks; auto-escalation to buying groups; the timed auction where the new car dealership that is dealing the trade is now the auctioneer; as well as robot bidders; and a whole raft of features including an onboarding mobile app that makes loading a car onto our platform a breeze.

But there was one more nut to crack, and that was valuations. You see, we are information brokers at the heart of it. We level the playing field between buyer and seller so that the seller gets a fair price and the buyer (who is usually a second-hand car dealer) gets a piece of decent inventory to make a healthy profit. Ergo we are the one that should provide a valuation to grease the wheels. Making money in remarketing automobiles should not be a zero sum game. 

Black Book, Kelly, Blue Book, VAuto and all of the other valuators in the marketspace use analytics to determine guidelines for fair valuations. However, standard statistical practices aren't good enough for several reasons.  For example, Black Book collects reams and reams of data from car auctions around the continent, and uses their statistical tools to come up with a published valuation that is sold to dealers everywhere.  While one may be confident that it is indeed a standardized valuation (approximately) should that car go to auction, but there is a little secret in the auto business.  Up two-thirds of the trade-in vehicles never hit the auction.  Why? Because of relationship selling! People buy and sell from people with whom they have done business before and trust. The chain goes like this.  When a trade-in comes in that is not suitable for the lot, the used car manager gets on the phone to his go-to guys. If that doesn't work, he taps a few wholesalers that he knows. Failing that, a car goes to auction.  That is why auction prices are skewed. They do not truly reflect the value of the car. Either they are under-valued due to poor bidding at a particular auction or they are over-priced in a spate of auction fever. They are not the same price as one would get from relationship-base wholesaling.  Auto auctions are the third step in the remarketing of a trade-in. Everyone else thinks that it is the first step in the process. We know better. 

The sad fact in the business, is that if an auto sits for any length of time on a dealer's lot, he is losing money on it. Most used cars do not end up on the used lot at the dealership where they were traded.  

When you walk into a new car dealer with a trade-in, you are giving him a problem right away. He doesn't really know what your car is worth. He may have a good feeling. He will make you an offer, but ultimately whether the trade-in comes close to his valuation or not, and whether he makes money on the trade, is a crapshoot.

Analytics in automobile valuations fail for several reasons. The chief one is that analytics relies on one right answer when presented with a pile of variables. You can analyze all of the big data from every single auction, and you would be hard-pressed to come within a nominal number that is within, say 10% of what a car will sell for. The same car with the same mileage will have a different valuation and sale price for every auction that it goes to.  That is the key. What a car sells for, is what it someone is willing to pay for it at that given time!  And you can take into accounts brands, defect history, buying patterns, locale, color, mileage etc etc whatever, the two bottom-line parameters in any used car sales and valuations are unknown to the buyer.  They are (1) how the car was driven over its lifetime and (2) how it was maintained. These factors transcend all brand, mileage and other data points. And the buyer has to divine the answers by looking at the car or consulting an Ouija board.

Click on info-graph above. It is a view of the "Loudspeaker graph of valuations".  Analytics and big data will give us an average value for make, year, model, options, mileage and condition.  That is the oblong rectangle in the middle. If a trade-in is less than 4 years old and has low mileage, then valuating the car is a slam dunk. The junior guy on the lot who still doesn't have to shave the fuzz off his face every day can do it.  But as a car increases in age, the factors that go into valuations start to multiply. Was it driven by a little old lady to bank every Friday and idled while her gang robbed it, and parked for the rest of the week? Was it driven by a soccer mom, who had practice in the next town sixty miles away every day?  The green X can demonstrate a high range of the valuation and the pink X shows the low range of valuations.  Put simply, a valuation is a probability of what someone will pay for the vehicle on a wholesale level.

So how did we crack the valuations conundrum?  Well we do have a machine-learning, artificial neural network valuator, but we haven't put it into production yet. It simply is not ready at this point.  But we have put into production another source that is more accurate than Black Book, more accurate than any auction data, and actually intimates what a particular person in a particular locale will pay.  How did we do this? We went to crowdsourcing. The crowd is always right!

Local secondhand car dealers have intimate knowledge of their terroir. The secondhand car dealer who buys the trade-in, has intense knowledge of the very local market.  He knows what will sell and what won't, and for how much.  He knows what kind of car they need as a lure on their lot to generate foot traffic. He know what sells quickly and what doesn't. He knows who buys what in his neighborhood.  He knows that when the youngish, single female in her very early twenties is looking for a car, that red Chevy Cavalier in the back is just the ticket.  Their livelihood depends on it.  So we tap a bunch of them with our technology.

We have developed a crowd-source, social network, exclusive zone tool to give local, accurate appraisals using the latest in our platform technology. It's a win-win situation. The new car dealership uses a mobile phone to scan and explode the VIN number so there is no typing of the VIN, and instantly all of the data about that specific car appears, delivered from our platform. Then a quick, visually-based condition report is ticked in, and sent to the dealer's professional social network or his exclusive zone, based on relationship wholesaling.  The receiver, the guy who gets the opportunity to valuate the vehicle, is in a prestigious position. He sees upcoming inventory before it goes to auction, and he gets first dibs over the rabble on the good stuff coming up. With his valuation, he can put in an offer.  But we even kicked that up a notch. We have created the day trader of automobiles. One of members of the exclusive zone, can flip it to his group either to find out what it is worth, or to gauge interest in someone buying it.

If the car is somewhere in the bottom cone of the loudspeaker in the above diagram, and everyone takes a pass, then our analytics kick in. We don't try to valuate it there, but we find buyers who have bought this kind of car before.  After a few hours, the system sends the car to these guys for offers.  If that doesn't work? Then the car goes to auction on our platform. And if that doesn't work, it goes to a classified type of wholesale listing.  All of this happens without a human being present.  The platform does it all. We will sell the car no matter what, and we will sell it for what its really worth!

So, analytics and Big Data may fail in the valuation, but it doesn't fail us in find a buyer.  We sell used cars, but with the tech-infused platform that we have, with very unique Intellectual Property, I really don't mind being called a used car salesman.

Wherefores and Whys of Facebook Stock - Where it will end

(click for larger image -- Facebook stock chart this morning)

I'm taking off my geek hat and putting on my technical trader software guy hat and my entrepreneur hat, and will look at my favorite bĂȘte noire, Facebook. As I have so fearlessly predicted in these pages (HERE and HERE and others), Facebook stock is going to tank, and tank badly. Where will it end up? I am not afraid to make fearless predictions, and they usually end up near the mark. So I predict that Facebook stock will sink initially to the $14-16 dollar range. It will momentarily find some support there and then find its true valuation in $7-9 range. Remember you read it here first on August 2, 2012 when the stock price is pennies over $20.

So why will it tank may you ask, when Wall Street jokers like Arvind Bhatia say that it is worth the $38 dollar opening price? Either these buffoons were paid by the underwriters to say this, or they are hugely mistaken about what constitutes real value in business, and were enamored with the business play.

Facebook stated that because they have 900 million followers, that this is a huge unmonetized potential. I maintain that they cannot monetize this user base, because people do not go to Facebook to buy things. They go there to be social. It is like a hooker trying to sell her services in church. The French have a wonderful word: inaccrochable. It means "You can't hang it!". It's like trying to put up a Playboy centerfold in a kindergarten class. You can't hang it. Here's another example. If every time you met your neighbor on the street, he tries to sell you Amway, would you still be glad to see him on the street? Nope, in these instances, we just want to be social and not commercial. Facebook and Wall Street do not understand this.

But let's look at the pure business side of this. Zynga, the social networks games folks have tanked and lost 75 percent of its value. Groupon is limping like a ship pierced by torpedo in the hull losing 70 percent of its skin. Pandora Media's ship has plummeted to the depths of Davy Jones' Locker. What gives? It's the business side, stupid. What is the value proposition of these companies. Zynga sells you a $4 virtual cow. How big is that market and how long until you saturate the IQ-challenged market? The Pandora value proposition has disappeared because people don't want streaming -- they want to own the music for their iPods -- thanks to Steve Jobs. Groupon can't provide deep discounts in an economic downturn, because merchants need to milk every dollar from every person that comes through the door.

And Facebook? Let's face it. They are a Php driven website for desktop computers. They have missed the mobile market. They are brogrammers. They are not smart like the Google programmers who can spooge code down to the bare metal. They have missed their core value proposition -- that people want to connect in a lazy fashion with each other, and really don't want to shop while doing so.

So, I predict that unless Zuckerberg has the testicular fortitude to say that he was wrong and turn the Facebook ship 180 degrees, then they will continue their slide into oblivion.

What will the Facebook replacement look like, and how will it make money? Stay tuned.

Facebook's True Valuation, Stock Price and Capitalization

In yesterday's blog entry, I outlined why Facebook will never overtake Google. Most of the valuation of the company at $38 per share is based on unrealized, unmonetized potential. I argued yesterday, that the user base is near its limit of monetization, and gave reasons why.

So lets assume that one of the biggest fans of Facebook, Arvind Bhatia is right about Facebook's search capability. (I don't buy it, but let's go with it for the sake of argument). Bhatia says that Facebook's search capability is better than Google's and Facebook will monetize it. Nobody is better at monetizing searches than Google. They are the gold standard. They do it with less data on the searcher than Facebook, and they outperform Facebook by orders of magnitude in the revenue department.

Google currently trades at 19 times revenues. Facebook at $38 is 100 times revenues. If we say that Facebook is at least as good as Google, then it would be fair to assume that they also would trade at 19 times their revenue. That would make a fair share value of Facebook at $7.22 at share. That would make a market capitalization of $3.04 billion dollars instead of $16 billion.

Just for fun, let us double the fair market valuation to $14 per share because they have close to a billion in followers (although even Facebook admits that a fair percentage are fake accounts). That still is a long way off from $38 and $16 billion.

Facebook has a lot of potential to realize. I suspect that the Morgan Stanley and the hedge funds that bought Facebook did a lot yesterday to support the price at $38 a share in the last hour of trading. And the hedge funds are not going to permit the borrowing of shares to short the Facebook stock, so it may be kept up artificially for a while.

My own risk radar says that this valuation is way too high, and that Facebook will not fulfill its potential. There has to be a correction, like there was for Zynga that lost 13 per cent of its value on the same day that Facebook had its IPO. Ten percent of Facebook's revenue comes from Zynga and its Facebook games, so another red flag goes up.

The thing that really gets me, is that if a geek like me can see the obvious, why can't Wall Street and the pundits see the obvious? Are the financial markets so out of tune with reality, that players like Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs can tell us to believe what they say and not believe what our eyes and rational senses tell us?